Hello, |
Re: load() vs. read() This is my exact question! I need an answer to this! Thanks in advance, Grasswistle |
Re: load() vs. read() grasswistle - Fri Nov 01 13:51:18 EDT 2013 This is my exact question! I need an answer to this! Thanks in advance, Grasswistle
So "load" when following links or browsing Baselines; "read" when dealing with current version of a module. -Louie |
Re: load() vs. read() llandale - Fri Nov 01 14:30:55 EDT 2013
So "load" when following links or browsing Baselines; "read" when dealing with current version of a module. -Louie So, just to be clear, it is not possible to follow links and get the current version of a module with load? Thanks, Grasswistle P.S. By the way Louie, I've been lurking this forum for a while and I must say that the code fragments you have posted have made a world of difference in my work. I have links to your profile (as credits) all over the place and people keep asking who this God, Louie, is. Keep up the good work! |
Re: load() vs. read() grasswistle - Fri Nov 01 15:49:41 EDT 2013 So, just to be clear, it is not possible to follow links and get the current version of a module with load? Thanks, Grasswistle P.S. By the way Louie, I've been lurking this forum for a while and I must say that the code fragments you have posted have made a world of difference in my work. I have links to your profile (as credits) all over the place and people keep asking who this God, Louie, is. Keep up the good work! No, you can get to the current version following links using "load"; but only if the versioned link (and therefore the "ModuleVersion") is actually to the current version of the module. If you know you want the current version, use "read". |